![]() The creator is simply ignorant or misinformed about how armor works.They could have Super Strength, Charles Atlas Superpower, or be some nonhuman creature like an ogre, an alien, etc. It may be justified if the attacking character is much, much stronger than the defending character's armor was designed to handle.Sometimes combined with Made of Plasticine. A creator may want to make battles look as violent and gory as possible, so making the armor useless provides more opportunities for bleeding and dismemberment.In a video game, you can avoid the bother of additional fight animations or complicated physics/damage modeling if just hitting any part of the enemy can kill them. ![]() The repertoire of Flynning is largely based on unarmored fighting, and it's easier for the actors if they don't have to learn a whole different set of moves for defeating armor. Creators making a historical or fantasy work include armor for the sake of aesthetics, but dont want the bother of factoring it into combat.Such dehumanized extras make excellent Red Shirts and Mooks, with the bonus that an entire army can be portrayed by a half dozen or so stuntmen. It is often the case that in movies, games, and other visual media, armor and especially helmets are not really there to protect characters, but to render them faceless and anonymous.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |